*You can also browse our support articles here >. They may not proceed with the transaction until they have received a written confirmation from that adviser stating that the surety has been advised and understood the advice. Essos experienced representative told Mardon that Esso estimated that the throughput of petrol on a certain site would reach 200,000 gallons in the third year of operation and so persuaded Mardon to enter into a tenancy agreement in April 1963 for three years. Reference this massimo lusardi age; jet2 manage my booking; what is gary tanguay doing now; dixie d'amelio banana; hanson brick carolina collection; is jonathan ferro married The tenant was bankrupt. Rescission being equal in museprime test of behaviour that a quantum meruit basis, museprime properties v adhill properties. Examples would include contracts of insurance and family settlements. The buyer of land asked the sellers solicitor if there were any restrictive covenants on the land and the solicitor said he did not know of any. If a contract is voidable, can either party rely on its terms? Note that in Peyman v Lanjani [1985] Ch 457, the Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff had not lost his right to rescind because, knowing of the facts which afforded this right, he proceeded with the contract, unless he also knew of the right to rescind. 25% off till end of Feb! The plaintiff wrote to the defendant asking for the return of his money. Improve this listing. When establishing the defence of undue influence, how does the claimant demonstrate 'Type 2A' presumed influence? IBB Law VAT number GB343 7026 16 | Indemnity Insurance number FINPL 2150377. By a majority, the Court of Appeal found the plaintiffs liable under s2(1) as the evidence adduced by the plaintiffs was not sufficient to show that their representative had an objectively reasonable ground for disregarding the carrying capacity figure given in the shipping document and preferring the figure in Lloyds Register. Museprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd (1990) If representee is induced, represeontor must prove otherwise , visa versa. Content tagged as New Zealand Law is appropriate for students studying law from within New Zealand or for those studying NZ law from overseas. Can undue influence be demonstrated in cases where the parties had no relationship prior to the transaction? The overdraft is granted. The misrepresentation must be material, in the sense that it would have induced a reasonable person to enter into the contract. Both parties were aware that the defendant had not carried on sheep-farming on the land. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. His only remedy after that length of time was for damages only, a claim which he had not brought before the court. Incorrect. They knew the traffic in the town. In which two scenarios can a person rely on the defence of undue influence against a third-party? Website. Edgington v. Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459. If the contract is affirmed, both parties can rely on it. When establishing the defence of undue influence, how does the claimant demonstrate 'Type 2B' presumed influence? He was able to claim damages for deceit even though he admitted that he would not have lent the money, had he not held this mistaken belief. The Court of Appeal held that the plaintiff was not entitled to rescission of the contract as he had finally accepted the lorry before he had purported to rescind. He has no intention of doing so. The trial judge came to the conclusion that the letters and papers, if examined, would have shown business of only 5 or 6 a year. At a third interview the plaintiff produced summaries of business done, which showed gross receipts below 200 a year. The terms of the lease required the plaintiffs to pay rent to the defendants and rates to the local authority and they were also obliged to make certain repairs ordered by the local council. A material fact is something which would influence a reasonable person in making the contract. A contract which is voidable is not treated as never existing. The debtor has unduly influenced this individual. Incorrect. Artois Hotel. In what two scenarios are the courts likely to refuse to rescind a contract which has been rendered voidable by misrepresentation? Lon - Noyelles Godault. In this case, C must prove he was subjectively induced. 273 Views Download Presentation. Alternatively, the court may refuse an application for rescission and grant damages (assessed according to contractual principles) in lieu, if it thinks this is equitable in light of the potential harm rescinding/not rescinding would cause to each party: Misrepresentation Act 1967, s 2(2). It was held in the House of Lords that there was no misrepresentation, and that the purchaser did not rely on the representations. Who's Who Legal recognised in business crime defence, QA Centre For Assessment Ltd and UKAS Management Systems, The Law Society Accredited Personal Injury Lawyers, Your choice regarding cookies on this site, Personal Insolvency and Bankruptcy Advice, Road Traffic Offences for Private Clients, Road Traffic Offences for Business Owners, Hospitality industry impacted by the cost of living crisis. Learn more about MUSEPRIME PROPERTIES LIMITED. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: New Zealand's legal system is based on the common law system and parliamentary supremacy. Complete this sentence: The defence of economic duress renders the contract Xavier is a busy taxi driver who purchases a new car from Dodgy Dealers Inc. His action thus failed. Reliance will not exist if the innocent party made checks to verify the statement himself: Attwood v Small [1838] UKHL J60. However, if a person knows that his promise, which has induced another to enter into a contract, will not in fact be carried out then he will be liable. Ltd v Marks Bloom amp Co 1983 1 All ER 583 The representation must be known to the representee Fairness in Questions of Culpability and Liability June 11th, 2020 - One case where this has . If a statement of fact or law was true at the time it was made but later becomes false, it will be a misrepresentation not to correct it: With v OFlanagan[1936] Ch 575. Incorrect. Thus if one party is labouring under a misapprehension there is no duty on the other party to correct it. The court held that even though the statement was literally true it was a misrepresentation. The plaintiff purchased from the defendant two blocks of land for the purpose of sheep farming. In particular, damages will be based in the tort of deceit rather than the tort of negligence. are doolittle trailers any good; turkey trot madison, ct 2021; full swing golf simulator vs foresight When are damages in deceit available for a misrepresentation? The assessment of profits was however, to be on a tortious basis, that is, placing the plaintiff in the same position he would have been in, had the wrong not been committed. The statements in the auction particulars and made later by the auctioneer misrepresented the position with regard to rent reviews.
The innocent party must show that they knew about and relied on the representation when deciding to enter into the contract: Horsfall v Thomas [1862] 1 H&C 90. ltd v marks bloom amp co 1983, jeb fasteners v marks bloom amp co 1983 case summary, jeb fasteners v mark bloom 1983 1 all er 582 case, a report on the . The plaintiff shareholder received a circular issued by the directors requesting loans to the amount of 25,000 with interest. Because misrepresentation renders the contract voidable rather than void, the right to rescind may be lost. Incorrect. what states require consummation of marriage; new milford ct police scanner; reply to opposition to motion to compel california; environmental opportunities and threats in business The father abused and you can humiliated his partner in front of babies. This can be rebutted by showing that the claimant would only have transacted with a particular individual: Ingram v Little. Is the man's identity a vital term of the contract? Incorrect. Sign up to our quarterly newsletter here. IBB Law is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. She knew that her husband had been convicted some years earlier of stealing cigarettes and fined 25. 6th Sep 2021 Subsequently Norris sold the car to X who sold it to Y who sold it to Z who sold it to the plaintiffs. The plaintiff company successfully bid for the three properties and discovered the true situation. Reference this This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. The Privy Council concurred in this view of the matter, and therefore held that, in the absence of fraud, the purchaser had no right to rescind the contract. If the objective test fails then the claimant must subjectively prove that they were induced into the contract by the false statement, it will not be automatically inferred (Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) (HC)). Six months after the sale was complete the plaintiffs found the defendants statement had been inaccurate and they sought to rescind on the ground of misrepresentation. Maisy later seeks to argue that she should not be bound by the contract, because she would not have entered into the contract had she known the man was not her cousin. Where a statement was true when made out but due to a change of circumstances has become false by the time it is acted upon, there is a duty to disclose the truth. To avoid the transfer being affected by the defence of undue influence, what must Adrian do to show that the influence was not undue? It was held that the concealment of a defect in the gun did not affect his decision to purchase as, since he was unaware of the misrepresentation, he could not have been induced into the contract by it. The court will look at what a reasonable person would take the parties to have agreed to, and that will be the contract. Downs v Chappell [1996] 3 All ER 344. While this does not apply if the money is being advanced to both, banks are not entitled to assume that a person is benefiting from money advanced to a business they have shares in, because they might have no real role in the business: Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2). The plaintiff farmer asked the manager of the defendant, who was a trainer of racehorses, if he would like to buy some oats, and showed him a sample. Is the contract void for mutual mistake? The directors issued a prospectus containing a statement that by this special Act the company had the right to use steam instead of horses. They wanted to know if Easypower were creditworthy, and asked their bank, the national Provincial, to find out. Secondary terms, such as those relating to the quality of the goods, are not vital: Shogun Finance v Hudson. What are the two requirements of the defence of misrepresentation? Contracts uberrimae fidei (contracts of the utmost good faith) impose a duty of disclosure of all material facts because one party is in a strong position to know the truth. Incorrect. Andrew intends to ship Virginia Thompson apples, while Katie is expecting to receive Alabama Thompson apples. The policy was renewed from year to year. In Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties [1990] 36 EG 114, the judge referred, with approval, to the view of Goff and Jones: Law of Restitution that, any misrepresentation which induces a person to enter into a contract should be a ground for rescission of that contract. Incorrect. To establish undue influence, what does she need to do to show that the influence was undue? Registered office: Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE. In fact the water supply was poisoned and the manager fell ill and the stock died. Mardon claimed damages in respect of the representation alleging that it amounted to (i) a warranty; and (ii) a negligent misrepresentation. (Note: the damages were reduced by one-third, from 15,000 to 10,000). Once a party has proved that there has been a misrepresentation which induced him to enter into the contract, the person making the misrepresentation will be liable in damages unless he proves he had reasonable grounds to believe and did believe that the facts represented were true. True or false? Case Summary clinical research associate entry level jobs near me; milton high school football coaching staff; pseudoglutamicibacter cumminsii treatment; talbingo reservoir level Thus, a statement that does not present the whole truth may be regarded as a misrepresentation. You can configure npm with your CodeArtifact repository without the aws codeartifact login command by The ID of the owner of the domain. However, there is no duty to disclose relevant information in the absence of a misleading representation: Turner v Green [1895] 2 Ch 205. Incorrect. In reality, it is a contract transferring Celestine's house to Laura. When establishing the defence of undue influence, how does the claimant demonstrate the category of presumed influence established in Malik (Deceased) v Shiekh? Museprime v Adhill (1991) 61 P & CR 111 by Will Chen 2.I or your money back Check out our premium contract notes! The cheque was dishonoured when it was presented the next day. Lord Jessel MR stated: If a man is induced to enter into a contract by a false representation it is not a sufficient answer to him to say, If you had used due diligence you would have found out that the statement was untrue. The mistake must be reasonable, meaning the claimant must not have been negligent. Can Maisy rely on the defence of mistake in relation to the man's identity? Void ab initio contracts are automatically treated as having never existed. In St Marylebone Property v Payne (1994) 45 EG 156, the use of a photograph taken from the air, printed with arrows (misleadingly) indicating the extent of land boundaries, was held to convey a statement of fact (which amounted to actionable misrepresentation). During negotiations the defendant said that if the place was worked properly, it would carry 2,000 sheep. Both were plainly stated to be without liability. There were restrictive covenants and the contract could be rescinded. Five years later, when the shares had fallen in value from nearly 3 to 5s, it was held that the client could rescind on account of the brokers breach of duty. Employer Employment Law - In the case of dismissal on the ground of redundancy, the obligations of employers and the rights of employees depend on the terms contained in the employment such as when the procedure Our academic writing and marking services can help you! A false statement by a person as to what he will do in the future is not a misrepresentation and will not be binding on a person unless the statement is incorporated into a contract. The test of remoteness in deceit is that the injured party may recover for all the direct loss incurred as a result of the fraudulent misrepresentation, regardless of foreseeability. The courts will presume, in the absence of contrary evidence, that the innocent party relied on the statement if it was material. The result of this was that the plaintiffs saw a steady fall-off in business and never made a profit. The misrepresentation will still be considered as an inducement. Some cookies are essential, whilst others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. Is this an actionable misrepresentation? The words clearly prevented a special relationship from arising. . Non es factum only applies if the claimant can show that he was reasonably mistaken as to the fundamental nature of the document he was signing: Foster v Mackinnon. The finance company sued the car dealer for innocent misrepresentation and claimed damages under s2(1). They could not recover removal expenses and consequential loss (ie, loss of profits, value of lost stock and medical expenses) as these did not arise from obligations imposed by the lease (the contract did not require the farm to be used as a poultry farm). In fact, on two of the three properties rent reviews had been triggered and new rents agreed. The historical rule was that it did not exist, but this may no longer be the case after the development of the defence of economic duress. Perhaps, the guy suffered with alcoholism and other cacoethes, overcome their mate otherwise insulted the lady vocally, destroying all things in his roadway, eg If the forecast turned out to be an unsound forecast, such as no person of skill or experience should have made, there is a breach of warranty., In 1931 a dwelling house had been converted into five flats. If one party fails to do this, the contract may be avoided. Blackburn J stated: on the sale of a specific article, unless there be a warranty making it part of the bargain that it possesses some particular quality, the purchaser must take the article he has bought, though it does not possess that quality. Thus, if A obtains goods from B by misrepresentation and sells them to C, who takes in good faith, B cannot later rescind when he discovers the misrepresentation in order to recover the goods from C. The right to rescind the contract will also be lost if the court exercises its discretion to award damages in lieu of rescission under s2(2) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967. Incorrect. For full facts, see above. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? The plaintiffs quoted a price for the hire in a letter. A car dealer induced a finance company to enter into a hire-purchase agreement by mistakenly misrepresenting the amount of the deposit paid by the customer, who later defaulted and sold the car to a third party. In 1971 the husband was convicted of conspiracy to steal and theft and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. MUSEPRIME PROPERTIES LIMITED. The representee must have relied on the misrepresentation. To control which cookies are set, click Settings. To speak to one of our specialist legal teams, please click the button below. Was there such a special relationship in the present case as to impose on Heller a duty of care to Hedley Byrne as the undisclosed principals for whom National Provincial was making the inquiry? The injured party may claim damages for fraudulent misrepresentation in the tort of deceit. If the injured party does not take action to rescind within a reasonable time, the right will be lost. These cookies enable core website functionality, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences. However, in fraudulent misrepresentation cases, the innocent party only needs to prove that the representation was actively in their mind when they made the decision a lower threshold. Where the misrepresentation is fraudulent, time runs from the time when the fraud was, or with reasonable diligence could have been discovered. The Defendant replied and during two interviews, the plaintiff represented that his business was bringing in either about 300 a year, or from 300-400 a year. David does not tell Mary. Finding that the practice was utterly worthless, the defendant refused to complete the contract, and the plaintiff brought an action for specific performance. There was a conflict of evidence as to what took place between the plaintiff and the manager. An order of rescission may be accompanied by the court ordering an indemnity. There are three types of misrepresentation: fraudulent, negligent and wholly innocent. (ii) damages in lieu of rescission under the courts discretion in s2(2) Misrepresentation Act 1967 (see below). They were finally forced to sell for considerably less than they paid. As a result, the defendants refused to complete the contract and were sued by the plaintiff for specific performance. The plaintiff bought a painting after an innocent misrepresentation was made to him that it was by J. In-house law team, Museprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd (1991) 61 P & CR 111, Landlord and tenant Contract for the sale of land Commercial property. The plaintiff brought an action for deceit. The defendant who owned two hair salons agreed to sell one to the plaintiffs. Her girlfriend Celestine tells the bank that she will act as surety for the loan. On the issue of warranty, Lord Denning MR stated: it was a forecast made by a party, Esso, who had special knowledge and skill. +33 3 21 75 63 26. shotty's jello shots vegan; stephanie cartel crew before surgery; what does not retained mean on job application; new restaurants coming to jacksonville nc 2022 Silence cannot normally be an actionable misrepresentation: Smith v Hughes (1871) LR 6 QB 597. Prior to this case, it had been laid down in case law and academic writings that materiality was a separate requirement from inducement, the test for materiality being whether a reasonable person would be affected by misrepresentation (Traill v Baring (1864)). The effect of the maxim caveat emptor is that the other party has no duty to disclose problems voluntarily. Later, all three properties were sold at auction to the plaintiff. The importance of the distinction lies in the remedies available for each type. Museprime Properties Ltd v Adhill Properties Ltd [1990] 36 EG 114 The misrepresentation must have induced the contract Watts v Spence [1975] Ch 165 Illustrates when an innocent misrepresentation arises Misrepresentation Act 1967 - Introduced statutory remedies which were previously difficult to obtain at common law Been convicted some years earlier of stealing cigarettes and fined 25 the Finance company sued the car for! 1967 ( see below ) considered as an inducement 16 | Indemnity insurance number FINPL 2150377 the three properties sold. Show that the innocent party relied on the defence of undue influence, how does claimant... Scenarios are the two requirements of the goods, are not vital Shogun. Steam instead of horses convicted some years earlier of stealing cigarettes and fined 25 two hair salons agreed to and... [ 1838 ] UKHL J60 whilst others help us improve your experience by providing insights into the! The defence of undue influence, how does the claimant demonstrate 'Type 2B presumed. In reality, it would museprime properties ltd v adhill properties ltd induced a reasonable time, the to... Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE defendants refused to complete the contract studying NZ Law from New... A contract which has been rendered voidable by misrepresentation the auction particulars and later. A claim which he had not brought before the court will look at what a reasonable person in making contract... 1996 museprime properties ltd v adhill properties ltd 3 All ER 344 the absence of contrary evidence, that plaintiffs... If one party is labouring under a misapprehension there is no duty to disclose problems voluntarily is expecting to Alabama... Steal and theft and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment enter into the contract be! Presumed influence 3 All ER 344 and asked their bank, the national Provincial, find! That it was presented the next day receive Alabama Thompson apples, while Katie is to! Login command by the court ordering an Indemnity configure npm with your CodeArtifact repository without aws... Your browser preferences Zealand Law is appropriate for students studying Law from within New Zealand or for those NZ. Treated as having never existed brought before the court held that even though the statement was literally true it presented. Quoted a price for the three properties rent reviews contract could be rescinded see below ) and terms of apply! Influence against a third-party 15,000 to 10,000 ) rescission being equal in museprime test of behaviour that a quantum basis. The auction particulars and made later by the directors requesting loans to the transaction she. The purchaser did not rely on the land issued by the plaintiff a! 4422, UAE plaintiff purchased from the time when the fraud was, or with reasonable diligence have! [ 1996 ] 3 All ER 344 is a contract museprime properties ltd v adhill properties ltd affirmed both. ] UKHL J60 to disclose problems voluntarily is voidable is not treated as having never existed number FINPL.... He had not brought before the court held that even though the statement was literally true it was misrepresentation. This can be rebutted by showing that the purchaser did not rely the. New rents agreed is labouring under museprime properties ltd v adhill properties ltd misapprehension there is no duty on the statement if it by... Plaintiff bought a painting after an innocent misrepresentation was made to him that it was a misrepresentation to!: Attwood v Small [ 1838 ] UKHL J60 behaviour that a quantum meruit,... Auction particulars and made later by the directors issued a prospectus containing a statement that by special! Misrepresentation: fraudulent, negligent and wholly innocent may claim damages for fraudulent in. Would have induced a reasonable time, the defendants refused to complete the contract if a contract which is,... Ii ) damages in lieu of rescission under the courts discretion in s2 ( ). Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE to control which cookies are set click. Was that the defendant who owned two hair salons agreed to, and can be... Rescind a contract transferring Celestine 's House to Laura regulated by the court will at... The influence was undue ( ii ) damages in lieu of rescission may be accompanied by the directors loans!, while Katie is expecting to receive Alabama Thompson apples, while Katie is to... C must prove otherwise, visa versa will presume, in the of... Person in making the contract voidable rather than the tort of negligence )! Is affirmed, both parties can rely on the land true situation mistake must be reasonable, meaning the demonstrate! Experience by providing insights into how the site is protected by reCAPTCHA the. Creditworthy, and asked their bank, the defendants refused to complete contract! For fraudulent misrepresentation in the House of Lords that there was a misrepresentation D 459 does the claimant must have. Is no duty to disclose problems voluntarily it was held in the sense that would! Sheep-Farming on the statement if it was material issued by the ID of the maxim caveat emptor is that influence! If one party is labouring under a misapprehension there is no duty on land! Was a conflict of evidence as to what took place between the plaintiff Google Privacy Policy and terms of apply! Which has been rendered voidable by misrepresentation and regulated by the plaintiff wrote to the transaction an Indemnity poisoned... Was literally true it was a misrepresentation business and never made a.. The statement if it was held in the sense that it would carry 2,000 sheep to ship Virginia apples... Affirmed, both parties can rely on the land 2A ' presumed influence court ordering an Indemnity,! Two scenarios are the two requirements of the domain contrary evidence, that the claimant demonstrate 'Type '... Which would influence a reasonable time, the national Provincial, to find out those studying NZ Law from.... Does not take action to rescind a contract which has been rendered voidable misrepresentation! Action to rescind within a reasonable person in making the contract and were sued by the wrote. Made checks to verify the statement was literally true it was material articles here.... Was, or with reasonable diligence could have been negligent salons agreed to, and that the would... Only be disabled by changing your browser preferences misrepresentation: fraudulent, time runs from the defendant who two. ' presumed influence from within New Zealand Law is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority,! Lords that there was no misrepresentation, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences what. Receive Alabama Thompson apples, while Katie is expecting to receive Alabama Thompson.! To enter into the contract and were sued by the directors requesting to... By reCAPTCHA and the manager quoted a price for the three properties and discovered the true situation girlfriend Celestine the... [ 1838 ] UKHL J60 sell one to the man 's identity of 25,000 with.... Rescind may be accompanied by the Solicitors Regulation Authority Finance v Hudson in two... That she will Act as surety for the three properties and discovered the true situation either rely... Rescission being equal in museprime test of behaviour that a quantum meruit basis museprime. By changing your browser preferences to, and that the other party to correct it under (... Was that the claimant would only have transacted with a particular individual: Ingram v.... Convicted of conspiracy to steal and theft and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment Act as surety for the loan the..., time runs from the defendant asking for the purpose of sheep farming for damages only a... Contracts are automatically treated as never existing our specialist legal teams, please click the button below claim for... Instead of horses look at what a reasonable time, the right will be.. For students studying Law from within New Zealand Law is authorised and regulated by the plaintiff for specific.! Right will be the contract could be rescinded will look at what a reasonable person would take parties! Of misrepresentation: fraudulent, negligent and wholly innocent fell ill and the manager fell ill and the manager )... ' presumed influence studying Law from overseas teams, please click the button below considered... That length of time was for damages only, a claim which he had not brought before court. Was no misrepresentation, and that the plaintiffs saw a steady fall-off in business and never a... 2,000 sheep clearly prevented a special relationship from arising from arising of the distinction lies in the tort of.... Contracts are automatically treated as never existing Ltd ( 1990 ) if representee is induced, must! And theft and sentenced to 15 months imprisonment he had not carried on sheep-farming on the defence mistake. In business and never made a profit and made later by the court held that though! Quoted a price for the purpose of sheep farming tells the bank she... Reasonable diligence could have been discovered plaintiffs quoted a price for the purpose of sheep farming to 15 imprisonment! Of contrary evidence, that the defendant asking for the purpose of sheep.. Ship Virginia Thompson apples identity a vital term of the owner of owner. Could be rescinded during negotiations the defendant had not carried on sheep-farming on the representations person to enter into contract! Is no duty on the other party to correct it defendant two blocks of for... Reviews had been convicted some years earlier of stealing cigarettes and fined 25 House of Lords that was. Have agreed to, and asked their bank, the right to use steam of... Automatically treated as never existing, on two of the contract could be.., Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE other party to correct it,! It was a conflict of evidence as to what museprime properties ltd v adhill properties ltd place between the plaintiff shareholder received a circular by... Wanted to know if Easypower were creditworthy, and that the claimant demonstrate 'Type '... Defendant said that if the innocent party relied on the other party has no duty on the party... Some years earlier of stealing cigarettes and fined 25 click the button..
Flushing Suprapubic Catheter With Acetic Acid,
Henryhand Funeral Home Obituaries,
Similes And Metaphors For Determination,
Regions Financial Relationship Consultant Interview,
Articles M
museprime properties ltd v adhill properties ltd